<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>The Optimiskeptic - Politics</title>
    <link>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/</link>
    <description>The butter knife of hopeful ideas, positive thinking, and measured skepticism.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.2.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 07:58:25 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>“Yes We Did!” ...What Exactly?</title>
    <link>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/4-Yes-We-Did!-...What-Exactly.html</link>
            <category>Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/4-Yes-We-Did!-...What-Exactly.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Zachariah)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I’ve noticed that many of President Elect Obama’s supporters are going around saying, “Yes we did!”  To that I have a simple response:  &lt;strong&gt;No, no you didn’t!&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/4-Yes-We-Did!-...What-Exactly.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;“Yes We Did!” ...What Exactly?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:58:25 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/4-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Stats vs. Intuition: How Well Did I Predict The Election?</title>
    <link>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/3-Stats-vs.-Intuition-How-Well-Did-I-Predict-The-Election.html</link>
            <category>Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/3-Stats-vs.-Intuition-How-Well-Did-I-Predict-The-Election.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=3</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=3</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Zachariah)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I did glance at a few polls, but more importantly I read editorials in dozens of local newspapers of the battleground states, and put that all together with my own intuitions on voter behavior, election history, and sense of risk (I&#039;ll admit, some of my calls were quite simply gambles - I&#039;ll explain in depth down more).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, the four states that cannot be called right now + the one I really called wrong (North Dakota) were the &lt;strong&gt;exact&lt;/strong&gt; same five states I predicted would be tossups.  I knew these were the risky bets: North Dakota especially, lol.   That was more of a pot shot hoping-for-a-miracle-to-make-me-look-smart-bet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, in other words: I called it!&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/3-Stats-vs.-Intuition-How-Well-Did-I-Predict-The-Election.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Stats vs. Intuition: How Well Did I Predict The Election?&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:58:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/3-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Final 2008 Election Predictions (Nevada decides)</title>
    <link>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/2-Final-2008-Election-Predictions-Nevada-decides.html</link>
            <category>Politics</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/2-Final-2008-Election-Predictions-Nevada-decides.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=2</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.optimiskeptic.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=2</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Zachariah)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    It is one week from that fateful morning where we will all know who the next President will be (baring a repeat of the 2000 election). Here are my final predictions about the Presidential Election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I still reserve the right to adjust my predictions as new information comes available, but that will probably only find its way into the &quot;tossup&quot; and &quot;surprises&quot; sections. This total electoral count for each candidate is my final prediction.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/2-Final-2008-Election-Predictions-Nevada-decides.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Final 2008 Election Predictions (Nevada decides)&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:08:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optimiskeptic.com/index.php?/archives/2-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>